Categories
BREAKING THE CONSTITUTION CALL FOR ACTION COMMON SENSE CONSPIRACY, DEEP STATE CORRUPTION ECONOMY HISTORY HYPOCRISY INJUSTICE NEGLIGENCE, DERELICTION OF DUTY SOLUTIONS STUPIDITY THE TRUTH

THE BIGGEST REAL THREAT TO OUR DEMOCRACY

A. FACTS:

  1. ARTICLE 14 of the US CONSTITUTION:
    . SECTION 1 defines a “citizen” as one born here or naturalized.
    . SECTION 2 defines “state apportionment” as being based upon
    . . . . . . . . . . . the “numbers” of people in the state, excluding
    . . . . . . . . . . . “indians”. From this we can infer that only citizens
    . . . . . . . . . . . be counted in determining each state’s
    . . . . . . . . . . . representative count.
    Several Amendments after Amendment 14 make it
    clear that only “citizens” may vote.

2. ELECTORAL & CONGRESSIONAL APPORTIONMENT:

Each state automatically gets 2 electoral votes for its 2 senators plus its representative apportionment based on its percentage of the total population. This means there are 100 total electoral votes over and above the electoral votes based upon population, which makes it possible for a candidate to win the electoral votes while getting less than the popular vote.

Why is this so? The original Constitution was ratified by the states, each state being counted as a person. This continues to be recognized & serves as a protection for the lesser populated states from being dominated by the more populated states. Its only fair. Besides that, the states are the ones who can vote to amend or end the Constitution, since they are they original grantors.

As previously mentioned, each state should get additional electoral votes based upon its percentage of the total citizen population. And the number of representatives allotted to each state should equal its electoral vote. So the whole voting system is proportional and fair. .

Yet democrats are constantly heard complaining about the electoral college claiming it to be a “Threat to their democracy”. This is pure nonsense. They are GREEDY IDIOTS. First of all, our nation is not a “democracy”. It is a “republic”. Only more local areas like counties and cities can call themselves a “democracy”. States are “semi-democracies” because propositions are submitted directly to the electorate. But for that, states are also republics. Their idea of “democracy” is a primitive one that would utterly destroy the idea of a united states. If you are going to play identity politics correctly, then you better differentiate between citizens and non citizens and protect state sovereignty. Otherwise you don’t have a nation, you have a cesspool.

Citizens have a duty to protect each other from wrong, regardless of race, sex, color or creed. CITIZENSHIP IS THE ONLY THING THAT BRINGS US TOGETHER AS A NATION, NOT HUMANITY. Humanity will never bring the world together, because it is always mistreated one way or another. The humanity of today boils down to robbing from one to give to another. It is contrary to free voluntary gifting.

No matter, to democrats who are trying to dumb down US citizens by saying “Democracy is for all people where ever they are and regardless of citizenship”. So yes, citizenship is a threat to “their” primitive democracy. Why do you think the Biden DOJ/FBI seem to be harassing only US citizens and not illegals?

3. HISTORY OF US CENSUS SINCE 1950:

The last time the US census counted the number of US citizens was 1950 at which time there were 151 MILLION citizens of which 31% were children or roughly 51 MILLION children. In 1952, there were 66 MILLION voting citizens. Since 1950 the government appears to obfuscate the census counts, failing to differentiate between citizen and non-citizen populations, thereby distorting each states apportionment of House representative & elector count.

From 1960 onward. we have the following;
1960: 179 MILLION
1970: 203 MILLION
1980: 227 MILLION
1990: 249 MILLION
2000: 281 MILLION
2010: 308 MILLION

In order to determine the number of real citizens as distinct form the number of non-citizens without a distinct number being provided, the only way to approximate the number is via reverse computing. Given a) the total number of presumed citizen voters in a national election, b) the voter turnout, c) the total population, & d) the percentage that are children, it is possible to estimate the total number of citizens, x = a/b- 1/2(c*d) . But this is only a rough estimate & depends upon correctness of the numbers given by the government.

So, for the 2020 election we have:

Voted for Biden in 2020: 81 MILLION
Voted for Trump in 2020: 74 MILLION
a) Total number of adult citizen Votes: 155 MILLION

b) Voter turnout in 20202: 66.8%

Total number of adult citizen(?) voters:
155 / .668 = 232 MILLION ADULT CITIZENS

In 2020 the total 2020 population was:
c) & d) 331 MILLION of which 73 MILLION were minors.
Half of children estimated to be citizens: 36 MILLION

Total number of citizens including children in 2020:
232 + 36 = 268 MILLION CITIZENS

Total number of non citizens in 2020:
331 – 268 = 63 MILLION NON-CITIZENS

2020 Conclusions: https://www.aaarrrg.com/wordpress/?p=3052

4. THE NATIONAL DEBT

The national DEFICIT is the current year amount spent minus the current year taxes collected. If more money is taken in than spent it is a SURPLUS. The national DEBT is the accumulation on national deficits over the years. It can only be relieved by surpluses.

The national debt:

In 2000, it was $5.5 Trillion

GWB increased it by $4.4 Trillion to
$10 Trillion

Obama increased it by another $9.5 Trillion to $19.5 Trillion.

Trump increased it by another $8 Trillion to $27.5 Trillion

and Biden will increase it by at least
$10 Trillion to $ 37.5 Trillion.

Trump is the only one showing a diminished increase. He was not in for two terms. But neither will Biden be in two terms.

B. DEMOCRATS DESTRUCTION OF RATIONAL LIVING & ELECTIONS:

Illegal non-citizens are the perfect paradigm for the democrat global warming issue. After all, they walked here and did not drive. Do democrats really believe they are going to continue walking once they get here? Do democrats really believe that illegals are going to continue voting for them once illegals settle in?

What the democrats have done is to take the
BIGGEST POLITICAL GAMBIT IN HISTORY PUTTING IN JEOPARDY THE LARGEST GROUP OF PEACE LOVING CITIZENS EVER IMAGINED.

Democrats are deliberately destroying our democracy by exacerbating election difficulties via allowing untold numbers of foreigners to trespass into our country. Probably one of the greatest difficulties in conducting an election is knowing who is eligible to vote and who is not.

Counties are are suppose to be the first resource to determine this, because they are the central hub for identifying property tax payers. But the property tax rolls only identify property owners, not renters or homeless people or resident non-citizens. Therefore, each county registrar is supposedly charged with the task of identifying citizen voters.

Instead, the states appear to have taken charge of that task. And in so doing have made the task more inaccurate by requiring the motor vehicle departments to register non-citizens for voting as if they are citizens. As a result, the US Constitution is being violated, not to mention the near impossibility of obtaining a drivers license.

It should now be clear to every US citizen that the Democratic Party has become a traitor to our democracy by obfuscating the election process and employing the inflow of illegal entrants in the hopes of maintaining power. They are not without help from some very stupid republicans, aka, RINOS. Those now working in government need to ask themselves how far they are willing to go for a worthless paycheck.

It is clear that democrats have not inspired trust in our election system by maintaining open borders. That fact, coupled with the wide flung use of electronic election systems leaves the US citizen with very little confidence that elections are not rigged. It can be said that no matter which party is in control of the election process, without the electorate being able to validate their own counted ballot and see the accumulation of actual ballots counted for a particular candidate after the fact, there can be no confidence in the electronic tabulated election results.

Why The Border: https://www.aaarrrg.com/wordpress/?p=2553

C. THE NATIONAL ELECTION SOLUTION:

https://www.aaarrrg.com/wordpress/?p=2642

D. DEMOCRATS PROPENSITY FOR LAWLESSNESS & VIOLENCE:

ANTIFA & BLM are two violent groups that democrats seem to love. Where they certainly have a right to speak, they do not have a right to attack and loot businesses, setting them on fire. Contrary to the idiot reporter who can be quoted as saying “This is a peaceful protest”, NO IT WAS NOT. And contrary to the phony democratic party J6 committee claiming J6 was an “insurrection”, NO IT WAS NOT. On J6 there were at least two murders by Capitol Police of which democrats are proud. SHAME ON THEM!

To further their gas-lighting of the American citizen, they claim that “Domestic Terrorism” is on the rise while allowing in real terrorists. “Just look at all those lawless citizen vigilantes supporting Trump who is worse than Hitler”. Yata yata …. yata. How many times now have we heard the term “domestic terrorism” used by Biden’s corrupt DOJ coupled with the democrats slur, ‘Islamaphobia”. Such rhetoric only inflames a society that was evilly attacked by radical Islam on 911 & then told they were not a Christian nation by a deceitful president who used his power to persecute them further. If they had any intentions at all of promoting domestic tranquility, all they would have to do is to BAN SHARIA LAW which is not a religion. Sharia Law is a core part of Islamic ideology and stands completely incompatible with western values. 1948 India should have shown any intelligent person how dangerous Islam Sharia is to western democracy. I would dare say, if you wish to worship Allah instead of Christ, be my guest. But don’t try to push your bull poop laws down our throat.

E. MASTERS OF DECEIT.
The Democratic Party Ukrainian Playbook

Where fascism and communism have been traditionally seen as opposites, it would seem that the current Democratic Party, in conjunction with neo conservatives, has practiced a hybrid combination of these two opposites, sometimes appearing as communistic and other times appearing to be fascistic.
No matter their ideology, there is one most evident characteristic, ie, their desire to stay in power no matter the cost. And the Ukrainian coup of a duly elected president in 2014 is their playbook.

Here is the truth about the Ukraine.

https://androidmovie.com/movie/ukraine-on-fire/97895

Note that in 2011 the President of the Ukraine was democratically and legitimately elected. The events of 2013 and 2014 led to an unconstitutional overthrow of the government spawned by neo facists. Today we are very close in this country to repeating that unlawfulness and violence.

This fascist coup of a democratically elected president that took place in the Ukraine in 2014 is the model for todays Democratic Party strategy. When they are out of power or when their power position is threatened, they will stage violent demostrations to make it look like the opposition party is at fault. Just look at how they have staged the Jan 6 “insurrection” which was not an insurrectiion. Compare that to the George Floyd “peaceful” demonstrations that preceeded Jan 6.

The key thing in understanding the Ukrainian 2014 coup is in identifying
WHO AUTHORIZED THE POLICE TO ATTACK THE PROTESTORS, knowing it would result in more violence.

Answer: He was known as YATS, the leader of one of the minority fascist parties.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arseniy_Yatsenyuk

In other words, he was instrumental in getting the opposition government to attack the very protesters he had encouraged to demonstrate at the capital. But he also alerted the protesters, because they were ready to deal with the police when they came. So it was a guaranteed violent clash. It was a perfect Alinsky setup to create a crisis.

Did we not see this same thing happen in the Jan 6 protests when it appears evident that the FBI had embedded operatives to incite violence among the crowd? If not, then please explain how some very obvious inciters of violence were not even touched by the justice system while other more innocent people were given the meanest treatment. This is why it is most important to understand the truth of the 2014 Ukraine coup.

F. DEMOCRAT PARTY DESTRUCTION OF ECONOMY:

This brings us to a discussion of taxation and government spending. How to disperse collective funds will always be an issue as long communism exists. Communism is not Commonism and visa versa. And printing more money is not the answer.

Dispersal of collective funds should only be based upon the common agreement of donors. Not by some dictator. Citizen taxes should only go to the protection of citizens, not non citizens. And the dispersal of funds for reparations of non existent damage is an abomination, as is the dispersal of funds to enemy nations. Dispersal of collective funds for health care should be limited to citizens only.

It might be reasonable to allow permanent resident non-citizens to participate in Social Security because it is a forced savings program not funded by citizen taxes. But certainly Social Security should not be extended to foreigners or adversaries.

At the current time, Congress is failing to observe these principles of funding in performing its duties. Republicans have been a big disappointment in countering the destructive Democratic Party that is doing everything it can to destroy this country while printing and spending money irresponsibly.

Failed Government: https://www.aaarrrg.com/wordpress/?p=1755

Categories
HISTORY STUPIDITY THE TRUTH

CONSTANTLY SCRATCHING AT A SORE DOES NOT HEAL IT

One would think that after so many decades, the trauma of wars would be forgotten. But Nazis do seem to keep the old sores alive.
As does the left in constantly stirring up trouble by constantly referencing slavery which died back in 1864.


These people cannot AND WILL NOT simply let things be. And because they WILL NOT, they become evil enemies of the truth and reason. It is one thing to look at history and judge who was right or wrong. Its quite another to perpetuate the trouble by either reliving it or by demanding reparations from the far distant progeny of the original culprits.


In either of these cases, there is no chance for the human species to improve.

Categories
BREAKING THE CONSTITUTION HISTORY HYPOCRISY PERSECUTION PROPAGANDA, DISTORTIONS, SLANDER & LIES THE TRUTH TREASON

ISLAM COMES OUT OF THE CLOSET

Categories
HISTORY

GREY HORSES MATTER

Likely Kentucky Derby favorite Essential Quality puts in final work

This weekend is the racist Kentucky Derby. The favorite is a grey horse which is the minority color. Only 8 grey horses in the past have ever won and no white horse has ever won.

Categories
HAPPY DAYS HISTORY

65 YEARS AGO

Categories
HISTORY THE TRUTH

THOMAS PAYNE, non-Christian, Vs. C. S. LEWIS, Christian. The Age Of Reason v Mere Christianity

(Correction: Payne was not an atheist. Atheistic liberals would paint him as one. However, he did reject the Bible while claiming to believe in one natural God. So it could be said that he was not a Christian, yet he still believed in a creator. So he was a creationist.)

Man’s intellect has always been at odds with Christian belief in the Bible. Every person struggles to reconcile what he see as fact verses fantasy. What is frequently overlooked is that it is out of our own imagination that fantasy becomes fact. This is one reason I find it objectionable to rule out Christianity simply because my brain says “It ain’t so”. To do so would be arrogance and potentially deceitful.

This does not mean that I accept anything and everything. Quite to the contrary, I am very particular about what I believe and most importantly, why.

Evidence is an important criteria for forming belief. To ignore obvious evidence is to stoop to stupidity. For example, one piece of evidence is the more recent find of highly compressed sulfur balls (aka, “brimstone”) around the ancient cities of Sodom and Gomorrah. Are we going to ignore and/or discredit that evidence? On the other hand, we can exaggerate the significance of evidence which is equally flawed.

Observed patterns of behavior is another factor in forming belief. Belief leads to judgment and judgment can lead to acceptance or condemnation. This is what I would call the process of the intellect.

The two men spoken of herein were both of superior intellect, but differed on the subject of Christianity. And maybe that is what this is all about, ie, intelligent people going in different directions from each other with no reconciliation.

If you do not know who Thomas Payne was, let me mention the American Revolution of the 18th century. He is the guy who wrote COMMON SENSE. Later on, he made it quite clear that he thought the Bible to be trash and wrote The Age Of Reason.

Because Payne had close ties to the founding fathers, it is being said today by liberals that the founding fathers were not Christians. That argument simply does not hold water for several reasons. First, it posits the fallacious reasoning of guilt by association. Secondly, it fails to acknowledge that all Christians, including the founding fathers, find themselves in a constant state of flux with respect to their belief in the Almighty. Thirdly, it fails to acknowledge the very personal and private nature of Christianity. Fourth, it is absolutely no one’s right to declare another person as being this or that unless the individual himself declares his own identity. And finally, it appears to be a fallacious conspiracy theory designed to undermined the belief in our democracy.

As the old saying goes “Misery loves company”. “If I do not believe in it, then why should you believe in it?” is misery’s mantra. And so it seems to be so with these liberals today. I have very little faith in what the liberals say about our forefathers. It is not up to me to judge whether or not the founding fathers were Christian. But because I see in their work the humanity professed in the Bible, I can only conclude that they were in fact Christians.

The founding fathers came from a Protestant background. To understand the founding fathers’ beliefs, one has to understand the history of religious persecution visited upon protestants by the Roman Catholic Church. It is not that the founding fathers were not Christians. It is more that they accepted the teaching of Martin Luther who rebelled against and was persecuted by the Roman Catholic Church. Secrecy of belief became an essential for survival. Today, liberals like to make a big deal out of the secrecy claiming it to be some mystic conspiracy. Utter nonsense.

Now, let’s turn to C S Lewis who wrote Mere Christianity in the 1940s. Lewis was an atheist professor at Cambridge University. But he became a Christian and expounded on the Christian belief in the greatest of detail and with the greatest of logical reasoning, as required by Payne. In my mind , Lewis not only proved the existence of God, he went on to detail why Jesus Christ was/is God incarnate, thereby refuting Payne’s belief in a non-Christ God. Were Payne alive today, we might ask him “Who is this nebulous God that you believe in?”, to which his answer could only be “I do not know”. On the other hand, C S Lewis gives us a very clear answer, ie, “God is Jesus Christ” & “Jesus Christ is God”. Therefore, to deny that Jesus Christ is in fact God is to deny the existence of God.

Thomas Payne believed in reason to the exclusion of Jesus Christ as being God. That is somewhat different from atheists who believe in reason, yet deny God’s existence. Regardless of this slight difference, certainly people of intellect would believe in “good” reasoning. But if we do not know who God is and what his character is, then how do we know good reasoning from bad or faulty reasoning? This in itself seems to be “self evident”. And of course we already know the atheistic liberals’ answer as to the identity of God, ie, they are God. Do you not see their circular reasoning and their underlying motive to rule over others?

As an Interesting side note, I mention John Winthrop whose Christian faith enabled him and his followers to survive in the early colonies where others did not. I also mention John Adams as being the only crew member of the HMS BOUNTY surviving the violence that ensued on Pitcairn Island, his survival being thanks to his Bible. So you atheist liberals can lament all you want to discredit the validity of the Christian belief. But we have the historical proof. There being no honor among thieves, treachery abounds and kills itself. Yet Christianity survives.