Categories
BREAKING THE CONSTITUTION

2020 CENSUS/ELECTION FACTS

Total 2020 population:
331 MILLION of which 73 MILLION are minors.
Half of children estimated to be citizens: 36 MILLION

Voted for Biden in 2020: 81 MILLION
Voted for Trump in 2020: 74 MILLION
Total number of adult citizen Votes: 155 MILLION

Voter turnout in 20202: 66.8%

Total number of adult citizen(?) voters:
155 / .668 = 232 MILLION ADULT CITIZENS

Total number of citizens including children:
232 + 36 = 268 MILLION CITIZENS

Total number of non citizens:
331 – 268 = 63 MILLION NON-CITIZENS

ARTICLE 14 of the US CONSTITUTION:
. SECTION 1 defines a “citizen” as one born here or naturalized.
. SECTION 2 defines “state apportionment” as being based upon
. . . . . . . . . . . the “numbers” of people in the state, excluding
. . . . . . . . . . . “indians”. From this we can infer that only citizens
. . . . . . . . . . . be counted in determining each state’s
. . . . . . . . . . . representative count.
Several Amendments after Amendment 14 make it
clear that only “citizens” may vote.

PRIOR CENSUS US TOTALS:
The last time the US census counted the number of US citizens was 1950: 151 MILLION
31% were children.

1952: There were 66 MILLION voting citizens.

From 1960 onward;
1960: 179 MILLION
1970: 203 MILLION
1980: 227 MILLION
1990: 249 MILLION
2000: 281 MILLION
2010: 308 MILLION
2020: 331 MILLION

CONCLUSIONS:
Since 1950 the government appears to obfuscate the census counts, failing to differentiate between citizen and non-citizen populations, thereby distorting each states allotted House representative count & elector count.

IT IS CLEAR THAT THE NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVES FOR EACH SANCTUARY STATE IS BASED, NOT UPON THE COUNT OF CITIZENS, BUT A COUNT OF ALL RESIDENTS, NON CITIZEN AND CITIZEN ALIKE. AS A RESULT EACH STATES NUMBER OF ELECTORS IS ALSO OVER STATED.

Each state automatically gets 2 electoral votes for its 2 senators plus its representative aportionment basd on its percentage of the total popularion. This means there are 100 total electoral votes over and above the electoral votes based upon population, which makes it possible for a candidate to win the electoral votes while getting less than the popular vote. This serves as a protection for the lesser populated states from being dominated by the more populated states. Its only fair.

Yet there are people who argue against the electorial college system They are GREEDY IDIOTS. If you are going to play identity politics correctly, then you better differentiate between citizens and non citizens and protect state sovereignty. Otherwise you dont have a nation, you have a cesspool.

Citizens have a duty to protect each other from wrong, regardless of race, sex, color or creed. CITIZENSHIP IS THE ONLY THING THAT BRINGS US TOGETHER AS A NATION, NOT HUMANITY. Humanity will never bring the world together, because it is always mistreated one way or another. The hunanity of today boils down to robbing from one to give to another. It is contrary to free volluntary gifting.

This brings us to a discussion of taxation and government spending. How to disperse collective funds will always be an issue as long communism exists. Communism is not Commonism and visa versa. And printing more money is not the answer.

Dispersal of colective funds should only be based upon the common agreement of donors. Not by some dictator. Citizen taxes should only go to the protection of citizens, not non citizens. And the dispersal of funds for reparations of non existent damage is an abomination, as is the dispersal of funds to enemy nations. Dispersal of collective funds for health care should be limited to citizens only.

It might be reasonable to allow PERMANENT RESISDENT NON CITIZENS to participate in Social Security because it is a forced savings program not funded by citizen taxes. But certainly Social Security should not be extended to foreigners or adversaries.

At the current time, Congress is failing to observe these principles of funding in performing its duties. Republicans have been a big disaapointment in countering the destructive Democratic party that is doing everything it can to destroy this country while printing and spending money irresponsibly.

One last thing while on the subject of Congress, all Congress has to do to assure citizens of a peaceful society is to BAN SHARIA LAW which is not a religion.

Categories
HISTORY

MASTERS OF DECEIT. The Democratic Party Ukrainian Playbook

Where fascism and communism have been traditionally seen as opposites, it would seem that the current Democratic party, in conjunction with neo conservatives, has practiced a hybrid combination of these two opposites, sometimes appearing as communistic and other times appearing to be fascistic.
No matter their ideology, there is one most evident characteristic, ie, their desire to stay in power no matter the cost. And the Ukrainian coup of a duly elected president in 2014 is their playbook.

Here is the truth about the Ukraine.

https://androidmovie.com/movie/ukraine-on-fire/97895

Note that in 2011 the President of the Ukraine was democratically and legitimately elected. The events of 2013 and 2014 led to an unconstitutional overthrow of the government spawned by neo facists. Today we are very close in this country to repeating that unlawfulness and violence.

This fascist coup of a democratically elected president that took place in the Ukraine in 2014 is the model for todays Democratic Party strategy. When they are out of power or when their power position is threatened, they will stage violent demostrations to make it look like the opposition party is at fault. Just look at how they have staged the Jan 6 “insurrection” which was not an insurrectiion. Compare that to the George Floyd “peaceful” demonstrations that preceeded Jan 6.

The key thing in understanding the Ukrainian 2014 coup is in identifying
WHO AUTHORIZED THE POLICE TO ATTACK THE PROTESTORS, knowing it would result in more violence.

Answer: He was known as YATS, the leader of one of the minority fascist parties.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arseniy_Yatsenyuk

In other words, he was instrumental in getting the opposition government to attack the very protesters he had encouraged to demonstrate at the capital. But he also alerted the protesters, because they were ready to deal with the police when they came. So it was a guaranteed violent clash. It was a perfect Alinsky setup to create a crisis.

Did we not see this same thing happen in the Jan 6 protests when it appears evident that the FBI had embedded operatives to incite violence among the crowd? If not, then please explain how some very obvious inciters of violence were not even touched by the justice system while other more innocent people were given the meanest treatment. This is why it is most important to understand the truth of the 2014 Ukraine coup.