Why can’t you understand George Soros? It’s because he has no boundaries in his thinking. Everything is “opened” , therefore nothing is definable. As a matter of fact, he admits that his opened society is more important than nationalism and democracy. So he has become a meddling old fool and an enemy of democracy and nationalism. And because he speaks in very vague terms and has made a lot of money, he appears to be super intelligent. Bottom line is that he is a survivalist at the expense of others & one step above committing the criminal acts he pays others to do.
His entire thinking is based upon counter-intuitivism which got him rich in the first place. What does that mean? Everyone now knows that when an airplane’s wings stop flying, intuition says to pull back on the stick, which is wrong. To correct a stall, it is necessary to do the opposite of intuition, ie push forward on the stick. That’s counter-intuitivism. And it worked for Soros in making money. BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT IT WORKS IN ALL SITUATIONS.
What Soros calls his “philantropy” is actually “political activism”, sometimes good, but more recently bad . Soros was instrumental in the downfall of So Africa’s Apartide government, which was a situation where the white minority was ruling over the black majority. But he has since obviously reversed his views on the majority ruling over the minority when it comes to the United States, opting to base his entitre thinking upon skin color, sexual orientation, etc. We can well expect that the teaching of Critical Race Theory in our schools has been funded by George Soros, in addition to his other follies.
So why has Soros funded DAs that refuse to prosecute? IT SHOULD BE OBVIOUS THAT SOROS IS VIOLATING POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION LAWS. Therefore, his funding of DAs is PREPAID BRIBERY.
To diverge, let me say a word about “counter intuitivism”. Counter intuitivism (counter-intuition) may work in some situations, but to apply it across the board can have some disasterous results. I think we all consider doing something counter-intuitive at one time or another, especially when we are searching for answers or are boxed in. Nevertheless, we better be sure that results of doing sonething counter intuitive is not going to be worse than if we had done nothing at all.
Our fore fathers admonished us to recognize the “self evident”, ie the obvious. In the movie Star Wars the similar phrase was “trust your feelings”. I would prefer “trust your senses” and history.
But in war time, counte- intuitivism may work, because it surprises the enemy. And of course that is assuming you intend to justifiably kill the enemy. Just be prepared to live with the results, ie your own good conscience. Even Nazi soldiers having executed jews admited they were plagued by their own conscience afterwards.
To diverge a bit further, a word about “hatred”. Nothing is worse than the hater of hatred. Hatred does not necessarily mean violence. This is not to say that “hate crimes” dont exist. A crime is a crime whether based upon hatred or not. To emphasize one particular type of crime above another similar type has the ear-markings of political malfeasance. So a murder based upon hatred should be dealt with no differently than a murder based upon other circumstances.
The intelligent person will note that there is justifiable hatred and unjustifiable hatred. Hatred based upon skin color is indeed unjustifiable & wrong, because it is indiscriminate And hatred of hate is also indiscriminately unjustifiable & wrong, because it does not consider all of the justifications & facts .
A “hate mongerer” is one who promotes unjustifiable hatred by attempting to instill the unjustfied hatred in others. The motivation is not based upon any real social justice, but instead is intended to strengthen the hate mongerer’s position. We have examples of this in today’s Antifa, Black Lives Matter, and the Democratic Party all of which use mass intimidation in one form or another and which George Soros so generously supports.
And now a word about “nationalism”. Too many people ignorantly equate this word with the German Nazi “NATIONAL SOCIALIST GERMAN WORKERS PARTY” and construe it with “imperialism”. They could not be any more undiscerning & wrong.
“Nationalism” is a way of dividing the world up into more manageable entities and implimenting democracy. It stands opposed to a globalist free flow chaotic world, unless of course there is some global dictator which is imperialistic in & by itself. In addition, nationalism permits like-minded people to unite together without dictating to people of another mind-set. Nationalism is more compartmentalized divetsity in thinking & mores which is overall more beneficial to the human species. So once again, the thinking of George Soros is quite defective & leading to exactly what every rational person fears, ie a global imperialistic dictatorship.
