Month: January 2024

Categories
COMMON SENSE

RESTRICTING BORDER ACCESS

Why Is It Important To Restrict Access To This Country?

Three Words:
Portable Nuclear Bombs

Over the years we have witness an increase in a mentality that is willing to blow itself up along with its preceived adversaries in an act of alleged justice. This makes it imperative that access to dangerous technology be highly guarded from falling into the wrong hands. This is the real problem facing humanity today. And we must not forget that fact.

Joe Biden appears to have forgotten that by allowing anybody and everybody into this country without proper vetting. In so doing, he has increased the probability of some nutjob acquiring access to dangerous technology.

Then there are those who say “Well, nuclear bomb technology has become so proliferated that it makes no difference what we do. So we might as well give up and let the nutjobs have their way.” WRONG. As long as there is one ounce of rationality left in the world, that glimmer of hope needs to be maintained.

One thing is for certain. To make “global warming” the central theme in global politics rather than protecting the world from nuclear proliferation is completely irresponsible. And what does DEI have to do with protecting the world? NOT ONE DAMN THING. DEI = Divisive Efforts and Injustice. It is interesting to note that DEI spelled backwards is IED, Improvised Explosive Device.

The RIGHT STRATEGY to defend against nuclear attacks from the air is Reagan’s STRATEGIC DEFENSE INITIATIVE. But to protect against nulear IED attacks, the border must be highly restricted with RBA, not open borders. And you cant have either protections if you persist in pursuing green energy, electric cars, and DEI to the exclusion of all else.

Categories
SOLUTIONS

SECURING CHECK WRITING

Before the advent of electronic banking, the use of a paper iou in the form of a check with the payor’s checking account number and hand written signature was sufficient for the bank to diminish the funds in the payor’s checking account. The only danger to the owner of a checking account came from the possibility of another person being able to to perfectly copy the hand written owner’s signature, something very improbable and easy to protect against occurring.

Then came the computer with its ability to perfectly copy the signature of a person. With a picture of the signature of a checking account owner and knowledge of the account number, it became much easier for thieves to do electronic forgery. The question now is, how to minimize this threat. And the answer would appear to be simple.

First, we nust realiaze that in order for the computer to copy a signature it can only do so in graphic mode. So what we need is a non-displayable text mode signature. And with online banking, we already have that non-displayable text mode signature in the form of a password. Therefore, any electronic transaction authorizing a bank to diminsh the funds in a checking account should require the password of the checking account owner. Should a bank fail in providing this security, then it should be held laible for any losses due to its negligence.

Categories
COMMON SENSE PROPAGANDA, DISTORTIONS, SLANDER & LIES

FAR LEFT OR FAR RIGHT

In political jargon, people like to use the linear terminology of “far left” or “far right” to condemn the opposite side. They go so far as to label the opposite side as “radical extremists” or “dangerous cult”. They tend to see “communism” as “far left” verses “nazism” as “far right” How convenient for them…. and HOW STUPID.

Such thinking is myopic, unintelligent and nepharious. It is flat earth thinking that fails to see that in the end both directions eventually meet in an irrational mode of behavior and accusation, as if completing a full circle where one direction is indistiguishable from the other. In mathematics it is well known that, given a rational radius, there is at least one irrational point around the circumference of a circle. So it is with political directions.

Categories
ECONOMY

FIAT CURRENCY

THE IDEA BEHIND FIAT CURRENCY.

We begin with the idea of “value of currency” and the factors that
contribute to its inflation or deflation.  But what is ‘inflation”?
Quite simply, “inflation” is
. . THE RISING COST OF GOODS AND SERVICES
. . DUE TO THE OVER ABUNDANCE OF MONEY.
And “deflation” is just the opposite.

A. THINGS THAT CONTIBUTE TO INFLATION:

1. INCREASED ACCESS TO MONEY.

. . a. PRINTING MORE MONEY.

. . . It should be noted that it is not necessary to physically print more
. . . money. All that needs happen is for the Federal Reserve to buy
. . . government ious and make a book-keeping entry crediting their
. . . own account with a phoney deposit & then debiting their account
. . . for the amount of the purchase of  those government iuos.
. . . He who does the book-keeping controls the economy.

. . b. LOW INTEREST RATES.

. . c. LOW TAX RATES.

. . d. DECREASED
. . .  POPULATION. MORE
. . . MONEY PER PERSON.

2. INCREASED COST OF
. . . PRODUCTION DUE TO
. . . SCARCITY OF RAW
. . . MATERIAL AND/OR
. . . LABOR.  INCREASED
. . . WAGES OR INCREASED
. . . ENERGY COST.

3. EXCESSIVE SPENDING.
. . MONEY TOSSING.
. . TOO MUCH MONEY CHASING
. . GOODS AND  SERVICES. ESPECIALLY PERTAINS
. . TO GOVERNMENT.

B. CURBS AGAINST. MONEY HOARDING

1. DECREASED ACCESS TO MONEY.

. . a. HIGH INTETEST RATES.

. . b. HIGH TAXES.

. . c.. INCREASE IN POPULATION.
. . . LESS MONEY PER PERSON.

2.  OVER ABUNDANCE OF RAW MATERIAL
. . AND/OR LABOR.

3. OVER PRICING, HIGH COURT COSTS,
. . CHARGING MORE THAN THE MARKET WILL BARE.

This is why the gov is struggling to gain total control over crypto currency. It takes away their ability to control the market. But crypto does offer a way for the gov to control induviduals.

A FIAT currency is not based upon any commodity like gold. It is strickly a book keeping system maintained by the banking cartel. The world departed from a currency system bssed upon gold back with Nixon. It is probably better to have the value of gold determined by the free market rather than a government opinion. But the hazard of that is that it allows rogue nations to hoard it and possibly upset the existing fiat currencies in use. The same may even be possible with crypto currency since it is like an electronic commodity that has limited supply.

In the end, it would seem that any currency sysyem amounts to the old barttering system in the exchange of goods and services. The question is HOW MUCH DO YOU WANT A THIRD PARTY,
like the government, interfering in your exchanges. And if you really
want a third party interfering to the extent that it forgets its basic
function of securing the nation’s borders, then lots of luck with that,
because you wont even have a nation to live in or a government to
protect you from unfair trading.

In real estate, the driving priority is location, location, location.
In government, the driving priority must be
THE BORDER, THE BORDER, THE BORDER.